Understanding the Problem: Getting Min and Max Dates from a Group By Statement
In SQL, when performing a GROUP BY
statement, it’s common to need to extract min and max values from a specific column. However, in this particular problem, we also want to get the corresponding dates for these min and max values.
The given table structure is as follows:
station datetime calculatedpower min_power max_power lt_dt lp_dt
ABBA 28AUG2018:0:0:0 100 1 100 01SEP2018:1:0:0 28AUG2018:0:0:0
ABBA 31AUG2018:12:0:0 88 1 100 01SEP2018:1:0:0 28AUG2018:0:0:0
ABBA 01SEP2018:1:0:0 1 1 100 01SEP2018:1:0:0 28AUG2018:0:0:0
ZZZZ 07SEP2018:0:0:0 900 900 3000 07SEP2018:0:0:0 21SEP2018:0:0:0
ZZZZ 09SEP2018:0:0:0 1000 900 3000 07SEP2018:0:0:0 21SEP2018:0:0:0
ZZZZ 21SEP2018:0:0:0 3000 900 3000 07SEP2018:0:0:0 21SEP2018:0:0:0
We are given the following GROUP BY
statement:
proc sql;
select
station
,datetime
,calculatedpower
,min(calculatedpower) as lt_calculatedpower
,max(calculatedpower) as lp_calculatedpower
from sumall
group by
station
;
quit;
However, this statement does not provide us with the min and max dates (lt_dt
and lp_dt
) that we need. We want to extract these dates based on the minimum and maximum values of calculatedpower
.
The Problem
The problem lies in identifying when each group of station
has its minimum and maximum calculatedpower
. In other words, for which datetime does lt_calculatedpower
(the minimum calculated power) occur and which datetime does lp_calculatedpower
(the maximum calculated power) occur.
Solution Overview
To solve this problem, we will use a sub-select that contains a case statement to identify the date at which the min and max occur. This sub-select is then joined to the original table.
Using Sub-Selects with Case Statements
In SQL, when using a sub-select with a case statement, we need to ensure that the sub-select returns all the columns from the outer query. In this problem, we want to join our want
table with its original table (have
), so we will include all columns in the sub-select.
Here’s an example of how we can structure our SQL query:
proc sql;
create table want as
select
have.*
, min(have.x) as min_x
, max(have.x) as max_x
, min(at.min_at) as min_x_first_at_seq
, min(at.max_at) as max_x_first_at_seq
from
have
left join
(
select inside.level1_id, inside.level2_seq
, case when inside.x = min(inside.x) then inside.level2_seq else . end as min_at
, case when inside.x = max(inside.x) then inside.level2_seq else . end as max_at
from have inside
group by inside.level1_id
) at
on
have.level1_id = at.level1_id and
have.level2_seq = at.level2_seq
group by
have.level1_id
order by
have.level1_id, level2_seq
;
Breaking Down the Solution
Let’s break down this solution:
- We start with creating a
want
table that includes all columns from our original table (have
). - Inside our sub-select (the
left join
), we use case statements to identify when each group ofstation
has its minimum and maximumcalculatedpower
.- The
min
function is used to find the minimum value in a group. - We then check if the current value (
inside.x
) is equal to this minimum value. If it’s not, we return an empty string for thatlevel2_seq
. Otherwise, we assign its correspondinglevel2_seq
as the minimum date (min_at
).
- The
- The same logic applies for finding the maximum value.
- We use the
max
function to find the maximum value in a group. - Again, we check if the current value is equal to this maximum value. If it’s not, we return an empty string for that
level2_seq
. Otherwise, we assign its correspondinglevel2_seq
as the maximum date (max_at
).
- We use the
- We then join our sub-select with the original table using a left join.
- Finally, we group by
station
and order by bothstation
andlevel2_seq
to maintain the original order.
Handling Potential Issues
One potential issue arises when there are multiple rows with the same minimum or maximum value but different dates. In such cases, it’s unclear which date corresponds to that value. To handle this situation, we could consider either ignoring duplicate dates or using additional logic to resolve the ambiguity.
For example:
- We could use an
IN
clause in our case statements instead of a simple equality check:- If there are multiple rows with the same minimum value but different dates, we would need to choose one of these dates. Using an
IN
clause helps us do this by allowing us to specify all possible values for that date.
- If there are multiple rows with the same minimum value but different dates, we would need to choose one of these dates. Using an
- Alternatively, if we know which row corresponds to the desired date (for example, based on some additional information), we could modify our case statements to explicitly return the desired date.
However, without further context or information about how to resolve these ambiguities, we will stick with using an IN
clause in this solution.
Last modified on 2023-05-27