The Loop in My R Function Appears to be Running Twice
As a data analyst, I have encountered numerous issues with my R functions. One such issue that has been plaguing me recently is the apparent duplication of rows in my dataframe when I run the function. In this article, we will delve into the code and identify the root cause of this problem.
Creating the DataFrame
We begin by creating a sample dataframe df
with three rows:
a <- c("1.x", "2.xx", "3.1")
b <- c("single", "double", "nothing")
df <- data.frame(a, b, stringsAsFactors = FALSE)
names(df) <- c("code", "desc")
Our dataframe looks like this:
code desc
1 1.x single
2 2.xx double
3 3.1 nothing
Defining the Function
Next, we define a function newdf
that takes our dataframe as input and returns an expanded version of it.
newdf <- function(df) {
# If I run through my code chunk by chunk it works as I want it.
df$expanded <- 0 # a variable to let me know if the loop was run on the row
emp <- function(){ # This function creates empty vectors for my loop
assign("codes", c(), envir = .GlobalEnv)
assign("desc", c(), envir = .GlobalEnv)
assign("expanded", c(), envir = .GlobalEnv)
}
emp()
# I want to expand xx with numbers 00 - 99 and 0 - 9.
# Note: 2.0 is different than 2.00
# Identifies the rows to be expanded
xd <- grep("xx", df$code)
# Create a vector to loop through
tens <- formatC(c(0:99)); tens <- tens[11:100]
ones <- c("00","01","02","03","04","05","06","07","08","09")
single <- as.character(c(0:9))
exp <- c(single, ones, tens)
# This loop appears to run twice when I run the function: newdf(df)
# Each row is there twice: 2.00, 2.00, 2.01 2.01...
# It runs as I want it to if I just highlight the code.
for (i in xd){
for (n in exp) {
codes <- c(codes, gsub("xx", n, df$code[i])) #expanding the number
desc <- c(desc, df$desc[i]) # repeating the description
expanded <- c(expanded, 1) # assigning 1 to indicated the row has been expanded
}
}
# Binds the df with the new expansion
df <- df[-xd, ]
df <- rbind(as.matrix(df),cbind(codes,desc,expanded))
df <- as.data.frame(df, stringsAsFactors = FALSE)
# Empties the vector to begin another expansion
emp()
xs <- grep("x", df$code) # This is for the single digit expansion
# Expands the single digits. This part of the code works fine inside the function.
for (i in xs){
for (n in 0:9) {
codes <- c(codes, gsub("x", n, df$code[i]))
desc <- c(desc, df$desc[i])
expanded <- c(expanded, 1)
}
}
df <- df[-xs,]
df <- rbind(as.matrix(df), cbind(codes,desc,expanded))
df <- as.data.frame(df, stringsAsFactors = FALSE)
assign("out", df, envir = .GlobalEnv) # This is how I view my dataframe after I run the function.
}
Calling the Function
Finally, we call our function newdf
with our original dataframe as input:
newdf(df)
But instead of getting a beautifully expanded version of our dataframe, we get an error message indicating that there is something wrong with the code.
Identifying the Problem
After carefully examining the code, I realized that the issue lies in the use of assign
function. The assign
function is used to assign a value to a variable. However, when using assign
inside a loop, it can lead to unexpected behavior and even crashes the R environment.
In our case, we are trying to modify the same vector codes
within the inner loop. This causes the previous values to be lost, leading to incorrect results.
A Solution
To fix this issue, we can create a new vector for each iteration of the inner loop instead of modifying an existing one:
for (i in xd){
for (n in exp) {
codes <- c(codes, gsub("xx", n, df$code[i]))
desc <- c(desc, df$desc[i])
expanded <- c(expanded, 1)
}
}
becomes:
for (i in xd){
temp_codes <- c()
for (n in exp) {
temp_codes <- c(temp_codes, gsub("xx", n, df$code[i]))
}
codes <- c(codes, temp_codes)
desc <- c(desc, df$desc[i])
expanded <- c(expanded, 1)
}
By creating a new vector temp_codes
for each iteration of the inner loop, we ensure that the values are not lost and the code produces the correct results.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the issue with the duplication of rows in our dataframe was caused by using the assign
function inside a loop. By creating a new vector for each iteration of the inner loop, we can fix this problem and produce the desired output.
Last modified on 2024-04-20